Wednesday, September 8, 2010

More on Nursing in Public

I have realized and integrated something important in my conciousness while NIP.

If someone has a psychological disorder towards breastfeeding, whether they acquired it in childhood or as an adult, that is simply not my problem. 

If they are struggling with this disorder, and they want my help, I will be happy to supply them with information, and answer any questions.  However, as a mother, my baby's needs are going to come first.  Period.  I have to put my baby's need to nurse as being more important than your psychological disorder.  And I do not apologize for that.  I don't think apologies are necessary.  It is just a statement of fact - I think my baby is more important than you.  Big surprise there.
Just as if you were struggling with alcoholism, ocd, bipolar, depression, etc., I would be willing to be a listening ear, but I am not going to let your disorder interfere with me raising and helping my baby.

*PS.  My husband wants me to mention that we were at a conference this weekend with mostly attachment parents, and no man acted like some sort of unthinking animal towards NIP.  We nursing ladies found it incredibly refreshing not to get ANY looks at all - covered or uncovered.  We were able to be in small group discussions (with men) and everyone just acted like it was Normal.  It was an incredibly freeing and wonderful situation.  A lot of older ladies actually smiled at us with approval.  We nursed wherever and whenever, when walking and sitting, while eating and by the pool. 
Great conference by the way - highly recommend it - incredibly friendly people. :)
www.rethinkingeverything.net

Oh, another great post I read the other day on NIP:

leakyboob.blogspot.com


Oh, And 

Please remember that it is always a Cultural bias/prejudice to think
breastfeeding past 1 is abnormal. If you think this way, you need to
really think about your attitude/prejudice and maybe do some research.
The baby has no idea that the culture s/he was born into has a bias
against extended breastfeeding. Scientists and anthropologists have
proven that babies and toddlers NEED breastmilk - optimally the minimum
is two years of age and the maximum is usually 7 or 8. Those are the
FACTS, not opinion, not bias. Worldwide, the average weaning age is 4
years old. The baby can not help that s/he is born into a society that
is prejudiced against breastfeeding - the baby just needs what s/he
needs. Like racism and other prejudices, educated people need to help
American society to realize that "extended" (full term) breastfeeding is Normal,
Necessary, and is best for the health of the baby. Optimally, at 2
years of age, the ratio of breastmilk to solids SHOULD be 75/25 to
50/50.   If you are extended breastfeeding, there is NO need to give
cow's milk - Breastmilk is way superior to cow's milk.

*In the second year (12-23 months), 15 oz of breastmilk provides:
29% of energy requirements 43% of protein requirements
36% of calcium requirements 75% of vitamin A
requirements 76% of folate requirements
94% of vitamin B12 requirements 60% of vitamin C
requirements-- Dewey 2001

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

More on Circumcision

  • All sanitary reasons for circumcision are debunked. They are just myths repeated. Europe and England has a 1% circumcision rate. Canada is about 10%. They are just as healthy. There are only 3 areas that circumcise baby boys routinely - America, Islamic Muslim, and Israel. All others consider it unhealthy and a human rights violation.
    Plus an open wound in a dirty diaper is not sanitary. 

    In 2005, America's circumcision rate was about 50 percent.  Thank God a miracle has happened and in 2009 the circumcision rate is 33 percent.  Keep informing and educating people and they will protect their baby boys!  We will continue to work hard to get that rate down to less than 1 percent like other nations.  

     
    A very small slit on the prepuce in the Old Testament was commanded by God. The circumcision that is practiced today (total removal of the foreskin) started in 200 A.D., way after the New Covenant (through Jesus Christ). Paul called those who circumcise dogs (one of the worst insults of the day) and the New Testament church (as well as the Christian church through the ages until the early 1900s) considered circumcision to be blasphemous, an outright denial of Christ's salvation. Circumcision in America happened because a few doctors and religious zealots decided that it would curb masturbation tendencies in young men. We know how well that worked out. However, circumcision is now known as one of the leading factors in erectile dysfunction in older men, so I guess they got their wish.

    Doctors are now finally being taught about the importance of the foreskin in medical school. For years, they weren't. Now most doctors will tell parents that it is a cosmetic surgery, not necessary at all. Unfortunately, 30% of all circumcisions are botched, leading to either more surgeries, or just a botched penis that leads to many sexual problems.

    How to Identify Circumcision Damage in the Adult Male
    http://www.noharmm.org.../IDcirc.htm
     
    And around 200 infant boys die of circumcision in America each year. For a purely cosmetic unnecessary surgery, that more and more insurance companies are refusing to even pay for (being not medically necessary after all.) They recall every product under the sun if just 3 or 4 babies die - but circumcision gets a free pass? It drives this mommy batty when she thinks about it all.
     
    Circumcision is also a sexual bias against males. There is no difference between female and male circumcision, but females are protected in the U.S., and males are not.

    For more info:
    http://www.drmomma.org/2010/01/are-you-fully-informed.html
    (a great site that has a lot of the research in one place with a ton of links to authoritative, official sites)

    My circumcision posts:
    http://melissaneece.blogspot.com/2010/06/circumcision-and-fathers.html
    http://melissaneece.blogspot.com/2010/06/circumcision-and-mothers.html
    http://melissaneece.blogspot.com/2010/02/circumcision-is-anti-christian.html
    http://melissaneece.blogspot.com/2010/02/circumcision-is-human-rights-violation.html




  • The importance of foreskin:
    And here are the medical reasons (and God-given reasons) to be intact as God planned:

    The foreskin has numerous protective, sensory, and sexual functions.

    ...· Protection: Just as the eyelids protect the eyes, the foreskin protects the glans and keeps its surface soft, moist, and sensitive. It also maintains optimal warmth, pH balance, and cleanliness. The glans itself contains no sebaceous glands-glands that produce the sebum, or oil, that moisturizes our skin.11 The foreskin produces the sebum that maintains proper health of the surface of the glans.
    · Immunological Defense: The mucous membranes that line all body orifices are the body's first line of immunological defense. Glands in the foreskin produce antibacterial and antiviral proteins such as lysozyme.12 Lysozyme is also found in tears and mother's milk. Specialized epithelial Langerhans cells, an immune system component, abound in the foreskin's outer surface.13 Plasma cells in the foreskin's mucosal lining secrete immunoglobulins, antibodies that defend against infection.14
    · Erogenous Sensitivity: The foreskin is as sensitive as the fingertips or the lips of the mouth. It contains a richer variety and greater concentration of specialized nerve receptors than any other part of the penis.15 These specialized nerve endings can discern motion, subtle changes in temperature, and fine gradations of texture.16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    · Coverage During Erection: As it becomes erect, the penile shaft becomes thicker and longer. The double-layered foreskin provides the skin necessary to accommodate the expanded organ and to allow the penile skin to glide freely, smoothly, and pleasurably over the shaft and glans.
    · Self-Stimulating Sexual Functions: The foreskin's double-layered sheath enables the penile shaft skin to glide back and forth over the penile shaft. The foreskin can normally be slipped all the way, or almost all the way, back to the base of the penis, and also slipped forward beyond the glans. This wide range of motion is the mechanism by which the penis and the orgasmic triggers in the foreskin, frenulum, and glans are stimulated.
    · Sexual Functions in Intercourse: One of the foreskin's functions is to facilitate smooth, gentle movement between the mucosal surfaces of the two partners during intercourse. The foreskin enables the penis to slip in and out of the vagina nonabrasively inside its own slick sheath of self-lubricating, movable skin. The female is thus stimulated by moving pressure rather than by friction only, as when the male's foreskin is missing.
    · The foreskin fosters intimacy between the two partners by enveloping the glans and maintaining it as an internal organ. The sexual experience is enhanced when the foreskin slips back to allow the male's internal organ, the glans, to meet the female's internal organ, the cervix-a moment of supreme intimacy and beauty.
  • Circumcision is not simply the cutting off of useless skin. Author Gary L. Harryman innumerates what circumcision destroys:
    ***Its connective synechia, which fuses the foreskin to the glans while the penis develops.
    ***Approximately half of t...he smooth muscle sheath called the dartos fascia.
    ***Most of the erotogenic nerve endings on the penis, including the densely innervated ridged bands, reducing the sensitivity of the penis to that of ordinary skin.
    ***Specialized epithelial Langerhans cells, a component of the immune system.
    ***Thousands of coiled fine-touch receptors, including the Meissner's corpuscles.
    ***Estrogen receptors--the purpose and value of which are not yet fully understood.
    ***Ectopic sebaceous glands, which lubricate and moisturize.
    ***The protective covering of the glans, normally an internal structure. The foreskin shields from abrasion, drying, and callusing, and protects from dirt and other contaminants.
    ***The entire immunological defense system of the soft mucosa, which may produce antibacterial and antiviral proteins such as lysozyme, also found in mother's milk, and plasma cells, which secrete immunoglobulin antibodies.
    ***Lymphatic vessels, the loss of which interrupts the lymph flow within a part of the body's immune system.
    ***The frenulum, the sensitive "V" shaped tethering structure on the underside of the glans is also usually amputated, severed, or destroyed.
    ***The apocrine glands, which produce pheromones, nature's powerful, silent, invisible signals to potential sexual partners.
    ***As much as 50% or more of the total penile skin, radically immobilizing and desensitizing whatever skin remains.
    ***The "gliding" mechanism. If unfolded and spread out flat, the average adult foreskin would measure 15-20 square inches, the size of a postcard. This abundance of specialized, self-lubricating skin gives the natural penis its unique-hallmark ability to smoothly "glide" back and forth within itself, permitting non-abrasive intercourse, without drying out the vagina.
    ***The pink to red to dark purple natural coloration of the glans.
    ***10% to 20% of its circumference because its double-layered wrapping of loose foreskin is now missing making the circumcised penis thinner.
    *** As much as one inch of the erect penis' length due to scarring and shrinkage from loss of the mobile, richly vascularized foreskin.
    ***Several feet of blood vessels, including the frenular artery and branches of the dorsal artery, the loss of which interrupts normal blood flow to the shaft and glans of the penis, damaging its natural function and possibly stunting its growth.
    *** An estimated 240 feet of microscopic nerves, including branches of the dorsal nerve.
    *** Perhaps most importantly, between at least 10,000 to 20,000 specialized erotogenic nerve endings of various types, which can discern slight motion, subtle changes in temperature, and fine gradations in texture.

    The foreskin protects the glans AND protects its inner mucosa where the most erogenous sexual receptors are located in the ridged band and frenulum. (Such protection from the sun which harms the receptors). The glans corona has only 15% of the sexual receptors which fight against the populace pain receptors located there. 65%-85% of the sexual receptors are cut off, 85% when the frenulum is scrapped off. The amount of receptors removed are equal to all ten fingertips. (Sorrells et al. "Fine -Touch Pressure Thresholds of the Adult Penis".

    Forming a hangman's noose, the erogenous value of the frenulum continues through its connected looped ridged band, decreasing value, with the lessor erogenous value being at the ridged band ventral. The glans corona's erogenous value increases as the ridged band"s erogenous value decreases, thus compensating the difference.


    Note: Langerhans cells have been suggested to allow HIV entry as reported in the three African studies on male circumcision and HIV. There are more Langerhans cells in the tonsils yet tonsillectomy is not recommended. Langerhans secrete langerin which has been shown to kill HIV.

    The circumcised penis uses 10x the pressure for vaginal intro over an intact penis

    One FUNCTION of the DARTOS MUSCLE is it tenses with en erection thereby creating a one piece solid skin tube where any action on the shaft is transferred to the erogenous ridged band which through its loop to the frenulum, this action is transferred to act on the frenulum, all this elicits an orgasmic response. No action on the shaft is wasted these erogenous structures, the ridged band and the frenulum. (Dr. John Taylor "Frenular Delta")


    Circumcision always removes all of the ridged band being at the extreme foreskin tip and part to all of the frenulum. Action on the shaft is wasted on these structures. Action must be directly on the frenulum remnant, if any remains.


    A new study found that approximately 117 neonatal (first 28 days after birth) circumcision-related deaths occur annually in the United States, one out of every 77 male neonatal deaths. http://www.icgi.org/2010/04/infant-circumcision-causes-100-deaths-each-year-in-us/
  • some helpful NEW Testament verses:

    Galatians 5:2-6: “Pay close attention to me, Paul, when I tell you that if you have yourselves circumcised, Christ will be of no use to you. I point out once more to all who receive circumcision that they a......re bound... to the law in its entirety. Any of you who seek your justification in the law have severed yourselves from Christ and fallen from God’s favor! It is in the spirit that we eagerly await the justification we hope for, and only faith can yield it. In Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor the lack of it counts for anything; only faith, which expresses itself through love.”

    1 Corinthians 7:18-19: “Was someone called after he had been circumcised? He should not hide his circumcision. Did the call come to another who had never been circumcised? He is not to be circumcised. Circumcision counts for nothing, and its lack makes no difference either. What matters is keeping God’s commandments.”

    that one just above means if you are already circumcised when you are called into the fellowship of Christ, you should not be ashamed, if you are called into the fellowship of Christ and are not circumcised you should NOT be circumcised!

    Philippians 3:2-3: “Beware of unbelieving dogs. Watch out for workers of evil. Be on guard against those who mutilate. It is we who are the circumcision, who worship in the spirit of God and glory in Christ Jesus rather than putting our trust in the flesh.”

    http://www.drmomma.org/2010/07/biblical-circumcision-information.html

    http://www.drmomma.org/2009/10/circumcision-christianity.html

    http://www.udonet.com/circumcision/christian.html

    http://www.noharmm.org/christianparent.htm

    http://www.circumstitions.com/Xy.html

    http://www.catholicsagainstcircumcision.org/

    Scriptures:
    Psalms 139:13-14
    Jeremiah 9:24-25
    John 7:19-24
    Acts 15:1-10
    Romans 2: 25-28
    Romans 3:29-30
    Romans 4: 9-12
    Romans 12:2
    1 Corinthians 7:18-19
    1 Corinthians 12: 18
    Galatians 2:1-21
    Galatians 5:2-6
    Galatians 6:12-13
    Ephesians 2:11-22
    Philippians 3:2-4
    Colossians 2:9-14
    Titus 1:10-14

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

The way to eat at Lubys for cheap

The nearest restaurant close to our house (fast food does not count) is Lubys cafeteria.
I like Lubys - it has a large open space, walls of windows, very family and baby friendly (the waitresses there love my baby - they exclaim - here comes the good baby! or the smiling baby! etc.)  I've never had any trouble nursing there, and its easy to spend a couple of hours there filling out paperwork or just talking.  (I wish they had wifi, but they don't.  We all need to email them to put wifi in their restaurants.)

We go once or twice a week.

Now how do we do that?  Because their entrees are expensive!
Its all about their new salad bar.

My typical salad - a big bowl of mixed greens, cucumbers, tomatoes, grated carrots, eggs,  mediterranean olives, broccoli, black beans & corn blend, bacon, and sunflower seeds. With ranch on the side.  All this for $2.29.

Or you can get their salad, two sides and a roll meal for $5.59.

And you can substitute a salad for any side, so you can get their daily $5.99 meal with a salad - Kevin often gets the spaghetti deal on Wednesdays - Spaghetti & meatballs, a salad, one side, and a roll.

And right now their kids meal is just $2.99 - including 2 sides, jello, and a drink.
Oh, and
Kids eat free all day Saturday, and $2 kid meals on Wed evenings after 4:30.


So Lubys is a great deal for families right now.

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Nursing in Public - my belief system

I've been thinking a lot about breastfeeding in public for the last few months.
I have another post entitled: Facebook: God created breasts for breastfeeding

One, it is extremely hard to do with any modesty if you are large breasted within the first 5/6 months.  But it does get better and easier the more head control the baby has.   I breastfeed in public very easily now at 8 months.  However, a small part of my breast tissue will show because I am large breasted, but no more than any woman who shows cleavage or breast tissue in their everyday wear.

If a woman asks me to cover up, and I know that she shows cleavage or breast tissue in her everyday wear, I am first going to be thinking "hypocrite" in my head, but basically I am just going to say, "I'm sorry but I choose not to do that."  However, if a woman who I know is modest in her everyday wear, and is a sweet type of woman, and if I see that she is a bit distressed, then I will be more willing to put a small cloth over the exposed breast tissue.

I will never put a blanket over my child's head because I do not want him breathing reverberated air (carbon monoxide).  I do have a nursing cover with a hole on top, and if the baby isn't squirmy (ie yanking it off) I will use it in auditorium type of situation where there are just a lot of people.  I will not use it for most situations however, because my child truly believes it is a toy, and will draw all types of attention to us because he is kicking it and yanking it and basically pulling it off.

Women who have problems with breastfeeding women exposing breast tissue in public, but expose their own breast tissue in their everyday wear or in their choice of swimsuits - well, I don't understand it.  Personally I believe they must have a problem with the actual act of breastfeeding - that they have a hard time separating the act of nursing the baby with a sexual type of act.  I wonder if most women who think that way have had issues with their own breastfeeding, or just chose not to breastfeed at all.


Here is a post I wrote after a friend's husband put in his status "Be discreet, cover your teet," plus a lot of hurtful joking about breastfeeding women in public in the comments following.

There are usually four reasons why you might see more than you want to when a woman nurses in public:
1) She's a new mom and she's just figuring it out - there is quite a learning curve, and it really is hard to learn.  One of the reasons why the USA's breastfeeding rate is so abysmally low (and in consequence our infant mortality rate so abysmally high) is that women are afraid of juvenile reactions from men who should know better.
2) Her baby thinks the cover is a toy - completely squirmy,
completely distracted baby makes momma give up the cover quickly.  Some babies have no problems with covers, some do.  Also, there is a concern with breathing in too much carbon dioxide.
3) Don't suggest using a bottle.  Some breastfed babies have not and will not use a bottle (it is called nipple confusion).  Some mommies can not pump - babies can get the liquid out, but the pump can't.  Mommies should be able to go out in public and feed their hungry baby wherever and whenever they want - oh wait - they can - all 50 states have laws protecting the breastfeeding rights of mothers, exposed or not.
4) Some women just don't care that some men never matured past their teenage years.  They are not going to allow some man's opinion dictate how they feed their baby.  So they breastfeed however they want to. They figure it is the immature man or woman's problem if they choose to be offended.  They believe in the saying, "If breastfeeding offends you, go put a blanket over your head."

And here is the question that I pose that tends to make people leave a breastfeeding woman alone:  If God created breasts to nurse a baby, is it a sin if you expose your breasts?  And if God doesn't think it a sin, then why should it bother me that you have a problem with it?

I believe, like the subject of racism, that being offended by breastfeeding is a socially, culturally taught thing, usually as a child or a teen.  You may live in a community where racism is an accepted norm, but that does not make it right.  You may live in a community where breastfeeding is offensive, but that does not make it right.

I see comments like yours and all I can think about are the many, many stories I have listened to and read from women who have struggled with breastfeeding, and I just want to get the word out that there are many reasons behind why a person might see more than they are comfortable with when glancing at a nursing mother. I just think of how many women have been genuinely hurt by comments and jokes like that and basically just wanted to get across that there are other viewpoints. It just makes me sad that people think jokes like the one in your status are culturally acceptable.


And to sum up, here is an article about breastfeeding in public that my husband Kevin wrote that I of course think is brilliant:

Written by Kevin C. Neece:
 
It is really a sexist view that proclaims that women are intelligent and responsible and can make choices about how they respond to stimuli and that men are just drooling animals, uncontrollably dominated by their passions because they are basically too dull-witted to do otherwise. Saying that men “can’t help it” or “are wired that way” may seem like compassion and consideration for men, but in reality it is a degrading gender bias. The truth is that we should expect all adults to behave like adults regardless of their gender.

As a man, I am personally tired of hearing such views bandied about so easily as though they are not at all bigoted. It may be culturally acceptable, but it is wrong to expect men to be the lowest common denominator of our species. Adult men are expected to be and are often portrayed as no more than college frat boys with families. But college frat boys are just junior high boys with newfound freedom and legal permission. And junior high boys are just elementary school boys with sex drives. So essentially, we are telling men that their progress as a gender is so stunted that they can never truly be expected to grow out of boyhood. This is now excused because we tell them that they are genetically wired to be too stupid to grow up. When you place no expectations of civility and maturity on any human being, they will more often than not respond to those expectations by remaining in the realm of their baser instincts. If, however, people are treated as beings capable of civilized, respectful behavior, they develop as such.

Moreover, the story of human progress tell us that the basic project of being human consists of learning, changing, growing, and trying to become more than what we are. By insisting that men are incapable of advancing themselves in a conscious, focused manner, we are depriving them of their basic dignity as human beings by ignoring their potential to grow in positive, civil and mature directions.


As a man married to a breastfeeding mother, to whom I am very sexually attracted, I can say that simply having developed the mindset of the natural, feeding function of the female breasts has allowed me to consistently view my wife’s breasts as sources of food when seen in a functional context, and as sources of arousal when seen in a sexual context. There has never been any confusion between the two. I did not have to be trained or desensitized. All I had to do was learn about the purpose and beauty of breastfeeding. Were the activity of public breastfeeding more common and accepted in our culture in general, and were our expectations of men inclusive of more than unthinking Neanderthal-like sex drives, there would not be an issue regarding the response of intelligent, civilized men to public breastfeeding. A mother must be asked to do no less than put the needs of her child before other considerations. A man’s response to what he may or may not see for a brief moment is his own to deal with.


The breastfeeding conversation among Christians today tends to focus on nipples, nudity, and naughtiness. Instead, Christians should be about the business of helping to develop a view of breastfeeding as normal, natural, and necessary. Part of that process includes the promotion of breastfeeding as an acceptable, everyday experience. This may create some difficulties along the way for Christians who are now grown men, but it will also help prevent future complications for the Christian men of tomorrow. If our boys are raised in a culture that values and openly accepts the fullest, truest nature of the female breast, we can come one step closer to a world that no longer reduces breasts, and indeed women, to mere sex objects.

Familiarizing the younger generation with a broader understanding of the feeding function of breasts will help to prevent unnecessary and unwarranted sexual temptation in the future rather than creating such temptation by presuming a universally sexualized view of the breast. This is not about a few instances of men being bothered by seeing a little skin. It is about a process of cultural education and development toward a more enlightened future where sex is a natural part of life and not something that dominates our lives in a negative fashion. In this future, breastfeeding is placed in its proper context as a normal and necessary function of motherhood, no longer overshadowed by over-sexualization, nor oppressed by the tyranny of titillation. Therefore, normalizing public views of breastfeeding mothers is a move toward moral responsibility and away from the domination of sexual temptation. As such, it is important that it be carried out, not flippantly or defiantly, but with a focus on awareness, education, and acceptance.


 I love articles that are thought-provoking and helps to rethink thinking, don't you?
Here is another great article on the issue of modesty that I think can be applied to public breastfeeding:

Modesty, Body Policing and Rape Culture: Connecting the Dots 

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/nolongerquivering/2012/12/modesty-body-policing-and-rape-culture-connecting-the-dots/

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Condensed Version of Pregnancy Research

Here is a very condensed version of my research.  I hope it will help you make all the myriad of decisions you will have to make in the next few months.

Oh, during morning sickness I could only eat a few ingredients - watermelon, tomatoes, fruit, potatoes, organic bread, quinoa, and rice.

If your doctor or midwife says you need protein (some say 40 grams a day, some say 80), do not ever take protein shakes (soy or whey) because they tend to make big 10 pound babies.

Some great sources of protein are quinoa (22 grams per cup, whole foods sells it in their bulk bins), Ezekiel cereal with organic milk or almond milk, or coconut milk, and spirulina powder.  Chicken and turkey are good meat sources, but you'll want to stay away from red meat cause it will make your back ache worse, and from fish because of the mercury.  I ate fish twice during my whole pregnancy, and i felt guilty for doing it, lol.

I did however take several supplements.
I took Juice Plus because I truly believe it helped me not get sick during my entire pregnancy.  No colds or anything.
At the beginning I could barely take any pills, only small capsules or soft gels.  I found a few prenatals that came in this form (Nature's Promise health food store on Park Row in Arlington has a few).
Once I hit 18 weeks, I could take pills again (the second trimester is so lovely). 
My prenatal of choice is Nature's Plus Source of life Prenatal, because it is Whole Foods based, not chemical, and because you only had to take 2 pills instead of 6, and it is reasonably priced.  And they never caused constipation (which is a problem with a lot of prenatals.  Iron supplementation usually causes constipation - bad, the type that gives you hemrhoids). But around 20 weeks you can take chlorophyll pills which are a great iron source with no constipation problems.  You just have to remember to take them everyday once you start.
I also took Omega 3 Fish oil 1000 mgs 2x daily which helps with your mood swings, growing the baby's brain, and with postpartum depression.
I take Now brand Calcium and Magnesium supplements because they are in softgel form.  Calcium and Magnesium really help with leg cramps and back aches. 

Best Big all-encompassing baby book:
Dr. Sears The Baby Book
Amazon link
www.askdrsears.com

Two books to avoid because they have a well-deserved reputation for sabotaging the breastfeeding relationship as well as other things, and basically just stupid:
The What to Expect Series
Babywise

Here are my top two favorite websites:
www.kellymom.com - best breastfeeding site
www.drmomma.org - my favorite website for all things parenting related.  I've read almost all the articles - I have learned so much from this site - highly recommend browsing thoroughly for several hours.

Also, here are some great birth videos:
You can Netflix Orgasmic Birth (link), Business of Being Born (link) (this one is also available thru Netflix streaming video so you can watch it on the computer), Birth without Violence link, and there is a lot of prenatal yoga videos if you type in pregnancy, and several breastfeeding videos if you type in breastfeeding. :)

Breastfeeding video:
http://www.breastfeedingvideo.com/

Another recommended video:
http://www.toysrus.com/product/index.jsp?productId=4067643

Consider taking a breastfeeding class at your local hospital or birthing center.
Two books you must get if you plan on going back to work after the baby is born.
The Breastfeeding Mother's Guide to Making More... Breastfeeding Made Simple: Seven Natural Laws...
And here are the two MUST READ breastfeeding articles:

Ultimate Breastfeeding Preparation Checklist
http://www.bestforbabes.org/checklist/

Breastfeeding Booby Traps

http://www.bestforbabes.org/breastfeeding-booby-traps/

Decisions, not choices

 Found this comment on facebook - love it.

Lorri Carr Personally, I am becoming disturbed at the use of the term "choices", as if we are all automatons who have no options except to select from the "choices" that someone else has pre-determined for us. I think that is faulty logic, and poor semantics, and degrades us into mere robots being told to "pick one of these", or to follow an algorithm (that we did not write) even if the circumstances do not all fit into the boxes.

I believe that whole, thinking human beings make DECISIONS, not choices. Decisions imply thought, questioning, careful contemplation of what one has been able to gather in knowledge prior to coming to a conclusion. Choices implies that the options are already limited by others, and you can only select a preference from the list that is offered to you, and I am offended by that. Perhaps these mothers whose feelings are hurt made choices instead of decisions, and THAT is why they feel like they failed - not because of the choice they made, but because they took the lazy way out and did not think, did not question, and they know it.

For example, if I am told that my "choices" are to have or to not have an epidural in labor, I say that is patently a lie. I can make a decision to explore other options, such as not even being in a hospital at all. My decisions are not limited by anyone else's list of "choices", they are arrived at after much consideration and thought, and usually as much research as I feel is needed to make that decision one that is intelligent and well-informed. Sometimes it only takes a few more split seconds to arrive at a decision than it would take to simply make a choice, so using one's brain works even in an emergency.

I don't offer choices to women, I ask them to think and make real decisions for themselves, because their options are limited only by common-sense safety factors and their own imaginations and physical abilities. A choice is a pathetically weak commitment, whereas a decision has weight and conviction enough to see a mother through a difficult birth.

This is a matter of basic human maturity. If a woman lacks the wisdom to make decisions, it is questionable in my mind whether she is suitable or prepared for motherhood. If it makes her uncomfortable to have to think, then obviously it needed to happen at long last. If it upset her, then she must have needed it. People who made the best possible decision at the time are never that easily upset about it afterwards.



http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=428512883668&id=197958149482

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Circumcision and mothers

I and my husband lately have been talking, and the issue of circumcision (I really hate that name, it makes it sound all pretty and clinical, I personally prefer genital mutilation and human right's violation) has really been weighing on our hearts lately.  We want to get more involved - in helping people, in educating people, and in the political arena.

Some people I'm sure think that I am judgmental or dogmatic.  I'm really not.  It just hurts my heart so much and I feel so much compassion towards all those poor baby boys out there and their loving but naive moms. 

I especially like just talking about the myths - there are so many crazy myths out there about circumcision, and its so interesting to me when people say, oh, I didn't know that - or - I didn't realize that.  Its the same as when I was teaching and a student finally gets that light of understanding in their eyes, and you know that you did your job well that day.

Moms are especially hard.  I think a lot of mothers have damaged psyches as well.  If they admit that it was something that was wrong, that they deliberately harmed their child, they would have to go through a grieving process and would have to live with the sorrow of that decision. It is easier to cling to their cultural/social/religious biases than to deliberately open themselves up to pain. It takes a strong, intelligent, confident woman to admit that circumcising her sons was wrong. I really feel sorrow and compassion towards both type of mothers - the strong and the weak.   Link to help with grieving circumcision

Some moms hang so tightly onto their beliefs, that even if their adult son came to them and said, I wish you had not done this to me, I wish I had my foreskin, I'm going to have to spend a lot of money and work very hard on restoring my foreskin - even if they were armed with this information, and could go back in time knowing what they know now - they still would circumcise.  And that is something I barely understand.

Some moms actually have had the gall to say - if he doesn't know what he's missing, he won't miss it.  And who's going to tell him that he should miss it but some vigilante mom telling him that circumcision is wrong.  That is one of the most sexist statements I have ever come across on a board.  I discussed this with my husband, and he says that it is very prevalent today to think of men of being incapable of thinking for themselves.  You can be as insulting as you want to men these days - its like some sort of feminist payback.  Just turn it around and apply it to women - oh, your family has breast cancer, so we're going to cut off your child's breasts - don't worry, if she doesn't know what she's missing, she won't miss it.  Some man might tell her that what was done to her was wrong, but we'll continue to tell her that it is no big deal, and she'll believe us.  She doesn't have much of a brain and won't look it up for herself.   Etc. Etc. Etc.  sigh.
Link to show what "he is missing" 
Prepuce video - The Prepuce  an informative video
Circumcised men psyche ink

The things that women will say astounds me, especially on the topic of GM.  I keep hearing, it should be a parent's choice.  Why?  Men are suing doctors RIGHT NOW AND WINNING for mutilating their genitals WITHOUT THEIR INFORMED CONSENT.   Who cares if a parent gives their consent - as a doctor, they are obliged by their own ethical code to do no harm to their patient without an informed consent.  A baby, obviously, can not give consent.  So all these doctors are very obviously being sued for malpractice. DUH.  Of course, until it reaches the billions of dollars that performing circumcisions bring in, unfortunately, it is all just a drop in the bucket.

I wholeheartedly believe that it should never be a parent's choice and firmly believe genital mutilation on boys and girls should be illegal.  Oh no, the government shouldn't have a say in this, women tell me.  Well, obviously it needs to be because society are still acting like idiots.  Just as binding a girl's feet had to become illegal before the cultural norm was changed, so must circumcision.

Which comes back to helping parents.   The most fervent intactivists I know are the ones who allowed their first born to be circumcised, and then discovered too late that it was the wrong decision.  They are the ones who are spend countless hours helping educate parents so that those parents don't have to live with regret.  Link to Second son, Second Chance

One woman said to me - the controversy over circumcision is just a lot of drama.  I don't think its that big of a deal.  This statement still gives me a slow burn inside.  Just because it is no big deal to you, doesn't mean it is not a big deal to the millions of men with damaged penises, all their grieving, sorrow-filled moms, and all their wives dealing with this issue.  Women can choose to be apathetic about issues where other people suffer (abortion, child slavery, domestic abuse, etc) because it is easier to live your lives pretending it doesn't happen, or that it does not pertain to you.  One day though many women get their heads out the clouds, and realizes that one of these issues is important to them, and they start getting more involved, and they start making a real difference.  This is what I hope the issue of circumcision will be like for me.  Life is unfair, but I have always believed that as Christians we should try to make life a little bit more fair.  And of course we should always strive to be rewarded with the words "well done, my good and faithful servant."
Link to stories of mothers who regret and are trying to make a difference.


This is a page in progress, I'll be back with more comments and links.

I did not circumcise my son - but I had researched the subject while I was TTC.  Who knows what I would have done in my 20s - I knew nothing back then  Here is a great article on reasons why not to circumcise your son.  20 reasons why I didn't circumcise my son 



And here are the medical reasons (and God-given reasons) to be intact as God planned:

The foreskin has numerous protective, sensory, and sexual functions.

· Protection: Just as the eyelids protect the eyes, the foreskin protects the glans and keeps its surface soft, moist, and sensitive. It also maintains optimal warmth, pH balance, and cleanliness. The glans itself contains no sebaceous glands-glands that produce the sebum, or oil, that moisturizes our skin.11 The foreskin produces the sebum that maintains proper health of the surface of the glans.
· Immunological Defense: The mucous membranes that line all body orifices are the body's first line of immunological defense. Glands in the foreskin produce antibacterial and antiviral proteins such as lysozyme.12 Lysozyme is also found in tears and mother's milk. Specialized epithelial Langerhans cells, an immune system component, abound in the foreskin's outer surface.13 Plasma cells in the foreskin's mucosal lining secrete immunoglobulins, antibodies that defend against infection.14
· Erogenous Sensitivity: The foreskin is as sensitive as the fingertips or the lips of the mouth. It contains a richer variety and greater concentration of specialized nerve receptors than any other part of the penis.15 These specialized nerve endings can discern motion, subtle changes in temperature, and fine gradations of texture.16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
· Coverage During Erection: As it becomes erect, the penile shaft becomes thicker and longer. The double-layered foreskin provides the skin necessary to accommodate the expanded organ and to allow the penile skin to glide freely, smoothly, and pleasurably over the shaft and glans.
· Self-Stimulating Sexual Functions: The foreskin's double-layered sheath enables the penile shaft skin to glide back and forth over the penile shaft. The foreskin can normally be slipped all the way, or almost all the way, back to the base of the penis, and also slipped forward beyond the glans. This wide range of motion is the mechanism by which the penis and the orgasmic triggers in the foreskin, frenulum, and glans are stimulated.
· Sexual Functions in Intercourse: One of the foreskin's functions is to facilitate smooth, gentle movement between the mucosal surfaces of the two partners during intercourse. The foreskin enables the penis to slip in and out of the vagina nonabrasively inside its own slick sheath of self-lubricating, movable skin. The female is thus stimulated by moving pressure rather than by friction only, as when the male's foreskin is missing.
· The foreskin fosters intimacy between the two partners by enveloping the glans and maintaining it as an internal organ. The sexual experience is enhanced when the foreskin slips back to allow the male's internal organ, the glans, to meet the female's internal organ, the cervix-a moment of supreme intimacy and beauty.

circumcision and fathers

links for mothers whose husband wants to circumcise:
 http://www.circumstitions.com/men-vuln.html
http://www.mothering.com/discussions/showthread.php?t=112410

for daddy:
http://www.fathermag.com/health/circ/gmas/

http://www.noharmm.org/raising.htm

http://www.noharmm.org/appeal.htm

http://www.drmomma.org/2009/10/dads-view-of-circumcision.html

http://www.circumstitions.com/Father.html

http://www.circumcision.org/satisfied.htm

http://www.circumcision.org/femalesex.htm

Whose Body, Whose Rights? video

How to Identify Circumcision Damage in the Adult Male

And here are the medical reasons (and God-given reasons) to be intact as God planned:

The foreskin has numerous protective, sensory, and sexual functions.

· Protection: Just as the eyelids protect the eyes, the foreskin protects the glans and keeps its surface soft, moist, and sensitive. It also maintains optimal warmth, pH balance, and cleanliness. The glans itself contains no sebaceous glands-glands that produce the sebum, or oil, that moisturizes our skin.11 The foreskin produces the sebum that maintains proper health of the surface of the glans.
· Immunological Defense: The mucous membranes that line all body orifices are the body's first line of immunological defense. Glands in the foreskin produce antibacterial and antiviral proteins such as lysozyme.12 Lysozyme is also found in tears and mother's milk. Specialized epithelial Langerhans cells, an immune system component, abound in the foreskin's outer surface.13 Plasma cells in the foreskin's mucosal lining secrete immunoglobulins, antibodies that defend against infection.14
· Erogenous Sensitivity: The foreskin is as sensitive as the fingertips or the lips of the mouth. It contains a richer variety and greater concentration of specialized nerve receptors than any other part of the penis.15 These specialized nerve endings can discern motion, subtle changes in temperature, and fine gradations of texture.16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
· Coverage During Erection: As it becomes erect, the penile shaft becomes thicker and longer. The double-layered foreskin provides the skin necessary to accommodate the expanded organ and to allow the penile skin to glide freely, smoothly, and pleasurably over the shaft and glans.
· Self-Stimulating Sexual Functions: The foreskin's double-layered sheath enables the penile shaft skin to glide back and forth over the penile shaft. The foreskin can normally be slipped all the way, or almost all the way, back to the base of the penis, and also slipped forward beyond the glans. This wide range of motion is the mechanism by which the penis and the orgasmic triggers in the foreskin, frenulum, and glans are stimulated.
· Sexual Functions in Intercourse: One of the foreskin's functions is to facilitate smooth, gentle movement between the mucosal surfaces of the two partners during intercourse. The foreskin enables the penis to slip in and out of the vagina nonabrasively inside its own slick sheath of self-lubricating, movable skin. The female is thus stimulated by moving pressure rather than by friction only, as when the male's foreskin is missing.
· The foreskin fosters intimacy between the two partners by enveloping the glans and maintaining it as an internal organ. The sexual experience is enhanced when the foreskin slips back to allow the male's internal organ, the glans, to meet the female's internal organ, the cervix-a moment of supreme intimacy and beauty.

Circumcision is not simply the cutting off of useless skin. Author Gary L. Harryman innumerates what circumcision destroys:
***Its connective synechia, which fuses the foreskin to the glans while the penis develops.
***Approximately half of the smooth muscle sheath called the dartos fascia.
***Most of the erotogenic nerve endings on the penis, including the densely innervated ridged bands, reducing the sensitivity of the penis to that of ordinary skin.
***Specialized epithelial Langerhans cells, a component of the immune system.
***Thousands of coiled fine-touch receptors, including the Meissner's corpuscles.
***Estrogen receptors--the purpose and value of which are not yet fully understood.
***Ectopic sebaceous glands, which lubricate and moisturize.
***The protective covering of the glans, normally an internal structure. The foreskin shields from abrasion, drying, and callusing, and protects from dirt and other contaminants.
***The entire immunological defense system of the soft mucosa, which may produce antibacterial and antiviral proteins such as lysozyme, also found in mother's milk, and plasma cells, which secrete immunoglobulin antibodies.
***Lymphatic vessels, the loss of which interrupts the lymph flow within a part of the body's immune system.
***The frenulum, the sensitive "V" shaped tethering structure on the underside of the glans is also usually amputated, severed, or destroyed.
***The apocrine glands, which produce pheromones, nature's powerful, silent, invisible signals to potential sexual partners.
***As much as 50% or more of the total penile skin, radically immobilizing and desensitizing whatever skin remains.
***The "gliding" mechanism. If unfolded and spread out flat, the average adult foreskin would measure 15-20 square inches, the size of a postcard. This abundance of specialized, self-lubricating skin gives the natural penis its unique-hallmark ability to smoothly "glide" back and forth within itself, permitting non-abrasive intercourse, without drying out the vagina.
***The pink to red to dark purple natural coloration of the glans.
***10% to 20% of its circumference because its double-layered wrapping of loose foreskin is now missing making the circumcised penis thinner.
*** As much as one inch of the erect penis' length due to scarring and shrinkage from loss of the mobile, richly vascularized foreskin.
***Several feet of blood vessels, including the frenular artery and branches of the dorsal artery, the loss of which interrupts normal blood flow to the shaft and glans of the penis, damaging its natural function and possibly stunting its growth.
*** An estimated 240 feet of microscopic nerves, including branches of the dorsal nerve.
*** Perhaps most importantly, between at least 10,000 to 20,000 specialized erotogenic nerve endings of various types, which can discern slight motion, subtle changes in temperature, and fine gradations in texture.
And occasionally a boy will lose his life from this needless operation. It has been estimated that as many as 209 babies die every year from circumcision and related complications.

pooping in plastic

My response to a woman who threw away her child's plastic kitchen cause she pooped in one of the kithcen drawers:

Hey, if ever there comes a time when you don't want to throw it away, a good way of cleaning it is to take it outside and take the garden hose to it. Also get a bucket of hot soapy water. Put it in the bucket or pour the water in it and leave it out in the sun for an hour or so. Then dump the water on the grass, and then take the garden hose to it again. Repeat as often as necessary. Then put some vinegar water in/on it for about 15 minutes, and then rinse. Then let it dry in the sun for a few hours. Cleaning anything poopy is just easier outdoors, you don't feel as icky out in nature. :)

Of course, I wouldn't know what to do if the child pooped in a wooden bureau drawer.......

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

blog giveaways page Ultimate blog party

Ultimate Blog Party!

Ultimate Blog Party 2010

My party post:  I'm a SAHM with a six month old boy and I am a researcher at heart.  My blog is all about my experiences as a researcher, and my experiences as a new mom, plus lots of links to sites on nutrition, birth and more.  See my main page http://melissaneece.blogspot.com/2007/09/why-this-blog-exists.html for more information!

I am an alternative mom - I believe in attachment parenting, prointactivism, probreastfeeding, procosleeping, probabywearing, proLive Foods/Raw foods, pro natural health.  This all came about through educating myself throughout my early thirties to the present, and meeting wonderful people along the way.


From the Ultimate Blog site:

It is about friendship, growing your network, and having some good old fashioned blogging FUN!
If you are partying with us for the first time… The Ultimate Blog Party has become an exciting tradition in the “Momosphere”. It is a bloggy carnival where participating bloggers publish a “party post” introducing themselves and then party hop through the linky lists meeting other bloggers.

The blogging life is about relationships — meaningful friendships that grow out of sharing who we are and getting to know one another. And like real life friendships, online friends need a place to meet and mingle.


So if you want to grow your network, meet new friends or promote your site, get ready for the Ultimate Blog Party 2010!!!


My Prize List:

US51 – Two winners will receive a lillebaby EveryWear carrier – the carrier you can wear every way, every where. Choose from Style, Sport or Organic.
Provided by: Scandinavian Child

USC 61 – A Sleepy Wrap baby carrier in winner’s choice of color from NAP, Inc.
Provided by: Jana Grayson (Sidetrack’d)

US30 – For one winner a little extra something to use with your Nesting Pillow or on its own, The Nest Egg gives support for your head, arm, breast, or for a little extra height under baby’s head.
Provided by: Blessed Nest 

USC 22 – Cushie Pushie Breast Support Pillow for Nursing Moms- a pillow designed to help you gain the correct breast position for easier breastfeeding.
Provided by: Cushie Pushie Company

US101 – One lucky winner will get this $450 Human Touch Foot and Calf Massager that is being given away by Still Blonde after All These Years!, a blog for women over 45.

US39 -Be My Guest certificate ($250 value) for one lucky winner, (2 night stay for a family of four) at any Hilton Garden Inn.
Provided by: Hilton Garden Inn

US74 -  We will give away 2 (1 for each winner) – $30 Amazon gift cards to the winner so they can buy items of their choosing.
Provided by: Afullcup.com

US31 – A $20 Amazon gift certificate.
Provided by: Jennifer Sikora (For Such a Time as This) 

US32 – $25 Target Gift Card!
Provided by: The Frugal Novice 



US52 – A $25 GC to Amazon.com.
Provided by: The Product Review Place

US69 – The Itty-Bitty Bookworm is a literature-based preschool curriculum. One winner will receive a year of our Bo Curriculum for 3-5 year olds. One winner will receive a year of our Bailey Curriculum for 18-36 month olds.
Provided by: The Itty-Bitty Bookworm

USC 8 – $55 E-Gift Card for Amazon.com Gift code will be emailed to the winner and can be used for purchases from Amazon.com.
Provided by: Kelly’s Lucky You

USC 15 – $50 Target gift card to one winner.
Provided by: Haley Quarles of Love, Life, Family…and then some

USC 3 – A $50.00 Target Gift Card.
Provided by: Peggy Gorman

US70 – $25 Kroger Gift Certificate
Provided by: Saidah @ A Proverbs Wife

US73 – We will give away 2 (1 for each winner) – $30 Amazon gift cards to the winner so they can buy items of their choosing.
Provided by: Escalate Network

US84 – One $25 Gift Certificate to Shutterfly.com.
Provided by: Scraps of My Geek Life


US87 – 2 winners will receive a $30.00 Amazon Gift Certificate.
Provided by: Christine/LiveLaughLoveCj

US88 – $25 E-Gift card to Amazon.com!
Provided by: Faith’s Firm Foundation

 US104 – Shoot Me Now is giving away one $50 Visa Vanilla Gift Card.
Provided by: Shoot Me Now!

US112 – $50 Amazon Gift card
Provided by: Robyn ~ Our Homeschool Home

US113 – $25 Walmart Gift Certificate
Provided by: Susan Stahley
Follow here: rsmstahley
US114 – $25 Walmart Gift Certificate
Provided by: Mary’s Country Life
Follow here: missunny

USC 35 - $50.00 CASH ~ Paypal Transfer. ($50 USD or current CAD conversion rate)
Provided by: American Muslim Mom

USC 37 – One winner will receive a $50 gift card to Amazon.com on here but that’s not it! There will be many other giveaways listed on my party post that you’ll want to check out!!!
Provided by: Shasher’s Life

USC 39 – A $50 paypal cash prize for one winner.
Provided by: MomDot

USC 40 – $20 Gift Certificate to Amazon.com.
Provided by: SandwichINK

USC 44 – $20 Gift Certificate to Amazon.com.
Provided by: Tara’s View on Books

USC 52 – TOT YOGA, a DVD that teaches yoga for toddlers from 10 months to 3 years old.
Provided by: Tuesdays at Ten, Ltd.


























Here are some great giveaways from around the internet.

Enter To WIN:IPSPrizeBag2010

-In Plain Sight Canvas Travel Bag
-In Plain Sight Luggage Tag
-In Plain Sight T-Shirt
-In Plain Sight Season 1 DVD
-In Plain Sight Season 2 DVD

To Enter:

go to:
http://momstart.com/2010/03/in-plain-sight-prize-pack-giveaway/

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Facebook - God Created Breasts for Breastfeeding

....not as men's personal play toys.

The brouhaha over Facebook deleting breastfeeding photos and closing accounts is heating up.  At least it is getting people to talk about it - and perhaps reexamine their thinking and attitudes toward breastfeeding.

Here is a great article:
The Most Obscene Debate on the Internet by Leigh Shulman
http://matadorlife.com/the-most-obscene-debate-on-the-internet/

The comments after this article are also really great - I was up way too late reading them all. At the end of this blog post, I included some excerpts from those comments.




I posted this article on facebook and it actually sparked a discussion among my friends, which of course led me to some deep thinking and so here is a long treatise on how I feel about the whole issue.



Here is another great website: The NIN Project – Nursing Is Normal

http://www.kathyobrien.org/NINgallery.htm





The first part is my first reaction to the article and the group discussion. Then I had a day to think about it and thus, wrote the second part.



First Reaction: I know that I try to nurse discreetly (though large and x-large chested women have more trouble with that) in public, especially in a room where there are men that I personally know. Not because I feel embarrassed, but because I don't want them to feel embarrassed. I'm not quite sure if I should feel this way, ie, if someone has a problem they should remove themselves from the situation, not us (the whole 'put a blanket over your head if you’re offended' slogan) though of course there is a world of difference between offending someone with breastfeeding, and embarrassing your male friends. I think the women that I talk to are more upset about the people who are actually offended by breastfeeding (like when someone compares it to urinating in public, as if urinating and breastfeeding are the same thing) than the people that are just embarrassed (ie, they don't want their male friends to think about their breasts in this way). However, a lot of attitude towards breastfeeding does come from our oversexualized society. The same people that do not have a problem with bikinis and thongs on the beach tend to have major problems with breastfeeding, and that is an ingrained type of problem that I think a lot of women would like to change. I just wonder how much a problem breastfeeding in public would be if everyone just saw it naturally growing up. For 30 to 40 years in America, formula was touted as superior to breastmilk, and nobody breastfed (which is one of the reasons our obesity epidemic is so high) so we all became accostomed to feeding a baby by bottle. I was breastfeeding in front of male children the other day (one was 11) and I wondered about it if it was ok, but as I watched their reactions, it was somewhat neat, because they just continued to play and be themselves, and just acted like it was normal that the baby was being fed this way. I think all their moms breastfed them and their siblings, and so they were just accustomed to it. I think that is the "militant" breastfeeders main goal is just to get people accustomed to breastfeeding, and so that most decent people will think it is something completely normal. What I think is most sad is when I see young women think its completely gross. I definitely would like to see that type of attitude to change.



A Day Later Reaction:

One of the reason that women are upset with facebook is that facebook's policy is simply that the nipple has to be covered. So they allow pasty and tassle clad breasts and string bikinis, but do not allow breastfeeding - even closing the accounts of breastfeeding mothers. This is discrimination, and the reason why they are suing facebook.



I have also found that as a large chested woman with an active baby, it is almost impossible to "nurse discreetly", and I am not going nurse in the bathroom.



It shows how we as a society are when we think of nothing of posting ourselves in a swimsuit or even a bikini on facebook, but are offended by breastfeeding .



It doesn’t help that in America, we have to learn the art of breastfeeding – its very hard work which is why only 1/3 of American women are still breastfeeding after 3 months. Unlike other cultures, our mothers did not teach us how to breastfeed, and so many of us have latch issues at the beginning. Lactation consultants are on the rise as more women are willing to get help in order to feed their baby. As an example of how breastfeeding is portrayed in the media, on the tv show The Office the other day, a male lactation consultant was clinically showing Pam how to breastfeed. She accepted him as a clinical person who knew what he was doing. Jim her husband however had very wrong thinking and had a problem with it. Dr. Jack Newman is a very famous male doctor and lactation consultant and has written many books on the subject of breastfeeding. So there are such things as male lactation consultants.



And that’s another issue – we need to continue to educate men on the importance of breastfeeding so that they will support their wives and girlfriends in this endeavor. It is very hard to breastfeed if you don’t have your male partner’s support. So I think the campaign for more breastfeeding needs to be in two parts – one to educate women that breastfeeding is important for the health of the baby and the mother (google 101 reasons to breastfeed to find out more) and to educate men that breasts are not only for sex and that breastfeeding is normal, natural and there is nothing to be “grossed out” about. The other part of the breastfeeding campaign is to make it easier for women to work and breastfeed. For many women their workplace is not at all breastfeeding friendly. I think the more women insist upon the right to breastfeed, the better off we as a society are. It is the women who will get this change accomplished, and one way is to breastfeed in public, and the other way is to insist that breastfeeding is portrayed as normal in all entertainment mediums. Including facebook.



Back to Facebook -

It should be about the reason behind the exposure. Women in low cut tops that show cleavage are trying to look beautiful and sexy. The aim is to look attractive to others. Same goes for bikinis and halter tops and anything else that shows off breasts.. Breastfeeding mothers however are not showing off their breasts to be attractive, they are simply trying to feed their babies.



Indecent exposure is against the law. But in order for there to be indecent exposure, there must be the opposite – decent exposure. Breastfeeding is considered decent exposure which is why there are laws protecting breastfeeding in public in most states.



I think we do men a disservice when we believe that they are not capable of multi-faceted thinking. Men can see breasts as sexual, but they are also capable of seeing them in different ways. Doctors are very good at this – enjoying their wives’ breasts but seeing all others as simply part of the human body. In fact, if they don’t have that capability, their thinking processes are considered deviant. I think men who are turned on by or uncomfortable with All breast exposure have deviant thinking – they are not thinking right (and were probably not raised around normal breastfeeding). For instance, I myself would have no problem with my husband being in a room full of breastfeeding women. He is capable of thinking of women as being thinking individuals, not sexual objects. He would not be “turned on” by breastfeeding women. I think men who can only think about breasts in one way have deviant thinking and need to be more introspective and figure out why they are that way.



I guess I myself tend to be very introspective. I have greatly different attitudes and perspectives now than the way I thought in my 20’s. Experience and research have taught me a lot, but I have also learned to think things through. If something makes me feel uncomfortable, I dig to the root of the matter and figure out why it makes me feel that way. Is it ok to feel uncomfortable about that, or do I need to change my thinking and expose myself to it more until I feel more comfortable with it. For instance, I always thought it was weird to breastfeed a child past 2 ½ when they really start to talk in complete sentences. Now that I’ve been exposed to older children breastfeeding, and now that I have done the research showing the many benefits of a four or five year old breastfeeding, I now have no problem with women choosing to “full term breastfeed”. Of course, it also helps to have worked with many children ages 2-7 and so many of them have babyish qualities until about the age of 7. Researchers say that children will usually self-wean sometime between the ages of 3 and 7, and that biologically, that is what is suppose to happen – how God created it. It is humans that twisted their thinking and perverted something God has created.



Speaking of God, its interesting (and somewhat difficult) to breastfeed in church.

I’ve been to several churches lately, and it varies widely on what they have for breastfeeding mothers. There was nothing at Tate Springs Baptist, I ended up in a unused classroom, and missed half the service. At the United Methodist of Hurst, they actually have it in the bulletin that you can watch the service in the parlor (with couches). That was nice. At Crossroads of Arlington, they have a tv in the hallway by the nursery. There is a changing station and chairs in front of the tv to watch the service. However, there is also a chair surrounded by screens, that if you sit there, you can’t see the tv, which defeats the purpose. Also, for me, its highly claustrophobic. So I just sat in one of the chairs in front of the tv, and hopefully all know if they come to that hallway, that they might see breastfeeding taking place. What I would really like is if we could all feel comfortable sitting in the service, doing what God intended us to do, what He made breasts for. Since Christ was breastfed, and if we are all to emulate Christ, churches should always encourage breastfeeding mothers. Hopefully one day, breastfeeding will become so normalized that people won’t see it as sexualized at all, and nobody will feel uncomfortable and can feed their baby wherever they want to.


I guess my main thought was that I believe that children should be exposed to as much breastfeeding as possible so that they will grow up thinking that it is a normal and natural process that should be encouraged. I want my son to have a "don't mind me, its ok" type of attitude towards breastfeeding. I don't want him to grow up thinking its sexual or perverted in any way, that a woman has to go off and hide if she wants to breastfeed.



Personally, I'd rather breastfeed in the car in public if I'm by myself because then I can listen to the radio. Its boring to sit on a bench and nurse in public. However, in the Texas heat this summer, that might be another story....


As far as breast exposure goes, I think my attitude towards it was shaped very early in life by seeing so much art work in the museums across Europe during my teenage years. Breasts and breastfeeding has traditionally been portrayed as being beautiful (especially Mary/Baby Jesus portraits) in all classical art. I guess I just don't see it as sinful if a man catches sight of my breast if I'm breastfeeding. I think intent is important - ie, if I'm showing my breasts to entice a man to have sex vs. I'm showing my breast to feed my baby.


Also, breastfeeding for me is validation. I've always had these great big annoying breasts that have hurt my back and make idiotic men stare at my chest and make it hard to exercise, swim, dance, or do anything fun. I've never thought they looked very attractive, they were just there to be put up with. Breastfeeding finally gives them purpose and meaning and a revelation of "oh, that's what God created them for" type of mentality.

Here is my husband's point of view towards the attitudes of facebook and other issues.  He is a freelance writer (contact me if you want him to write for you) and a manuscript editor (contact me if you want him to edit for you).  I just love his post, and would love to see it published somewhere.  This is the type of attitude more men need to have towards breastfeeding!
 
From Kevin C. Neece:
 
It is really a sexist view that proclaims that women are intelligent and responsible and can make choices about how they respond to stimuli and that men are just drooling animals, uncontrollably dominated by their passions because they are basically too dull-witted to do otherwise. Saying that men “can’t help it” or “are wired that way” may seem like compassion and consideration for men, but in reality it is a degrading gender bias. The truth is that we should expect all adults to behave like adults regardless of their gender.



As a man, I am personally tired of hearing such views bandied about so easily as though they are not at all bigoted. It may be culturally acceptable, but it is wrong to expect men to be the lowest common denominator of our species. Adult men are expected to be and are often portrayed as no more than college frat boys with families. But college frat boys are just junior high boys with newfound freedom and legal permission. And junior high boys are just elementary school boys with sex drives. So essentially, we are telling men that their progress as a gender is so stunted that they can never truly be expected to grow out of boyhood. This is now excused because we tell them that they are genetically wired to be too stupid to grow up. When you place no expectations of civility and maturity on any human being, they will more often than not respond to those expectations by remaining in the realm of their baser instincts. If, however, people are treated as beings capable of civilized, respectful behavior, they develop as such.

Moreover, the story of human progress tell us that the basic project of being human consists of learning, changing, growing, and trying to become more than what we are. By insisting that men are incapable of advancing themselves in a conscious, focused manner, we are depriving them of their basic dignity as human beings by ignoring their potential to grow in positive, civil and mature directions.


As a man married to a breastfeeding mother, to whom I am very sexually attracted, I can say that simply having developed the mindset of the natural, feeding function of the female breasts has allowed me to consistently view my wife’s breasts as sources of food when seen in a functional context, and as sources of arousal when seen in a sexual context. There has never been any confusion between the two. I did not have to be trained or desensitized. All I had to do was learn about the purpose and beauty of breastfeeding. Were the activity of public breastfeeding more common and accepted in our culture in general, and were our expectations of men inclusive of more than unthinking Neanderthal-like sex drives, there would not be an issue regarding the response of intelligent, civilized men to public breastfeeding. A mother must be asked to do no less than put the needs of her child before other considerations. A man’s response to what he may or may not see for a brief moment is his own to deal with.



The breastfeeding conversation among Christians today tends to focus on nipples, nudity, and naughtiness. Instead, Christians should be about the business of helping to develop a view of breastfeeding as normal, natural, and necessary. Part of that process includes the promotion of breastfeeding as an acceptable, everyday experience. This may create some difficulties along the way for Christians who are now grown men, but it will also help prevent future complications for the Christian men of tomorrow. If our boys are raised in a culture that values and openly accepts the fullest, truest nature of the female breast, we can come one step closer to a world that no longer reduces breasts, and indeed women, to mere sex objects.



Familiarizing the younger generation with a broader understanding of the feeding function of breasts will help to prevent unnecessary and unwarranted sexual temptation in the future rather than creating such temptation by presuming a universally sexualized view of the breast. This is not about a few instances of men being bothered by seeing a little skin. It is about a process of cultural education and development toward a more enlightened future where sex is a natural part of life and not something that dominates our lives in a negative fashion. In this future, breastfeeding is placed in its proper context as a normal and necessary function of motherhood, no longer overshadowed by over-sexualization, nor oppressed by the tyranny of titillation. Therefore, normalizing public views of breastfeeding mothers is a move toward moral responsibility and away from the domination of sexual temptation. As such, it is important that it be carried out, not flippantly or defiantly, but with a focus on awareness, education, and acceptance.